MCE123 Logo

This website uses Cookies, and by using the website, you accept our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and other applicable policies set by our Legal Department.

You agree to stay up to date on any changes to our legal policies, as they are posted, by visiting our Legal Department. For your viewing convenience, we are not required to notify you again.

MCE123 - Technology Development

Automatic Patent Comparison AI Systems

These systems would be for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Organization, and would allow the attorneys that look at Patent applications to compare all the intellectual property of one patent to other patents, not only by keyword, but also by the context of the patent – such that the AI would develop models based on different types of technologies that can be patented, based on the specifications of the Patentable designs, within USPTO’s computer systems.

The AI would be able to see potential patent infringement cases before they occur, such that it would rate the comparison value of each Patent to each other Patent, such as words used in each Patent, based on keywords, and assign each Patent a unique design concept. If two concepts are similar, the system will automatically compare the two Patents and determine which one was created originally, and which one was created after the fact, or by stealing the design concept from the original Patent holder.

The database would compare the different technologies based on their engineering capabilities and specifications, such as under the studies of electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, product design engineering, information technology engineering, computer systems engineering, civil engineering, biological engineering, chemical engineering, and other types of engineering studies.

After the proposed Patent is assigned different characteristics based on the studies of different types of engineering, the system would compare the properties of each of the Patents, for comparing to determine similarities.

The system would be able to process summary judgement recommendations for Patent judges based on the Intellectual Property of the Patent filing, or the pre-Patent filing documentation.

The software would also be able to interactively tell a Patent submitter, or Patent applicant, that their design may infringe on the rights of another Patent in the system.

This system would basically vet Patents before they get to the attorneys.

Additionally, the payment for the Patent application would be based on what is being claimed, as well as the complexity of the Patent, and how much time it takes the Patent Attorney to review the information, or whether the Patent was so straight forward, that it was pre-authorized by the AI systems because it was found to have been unique.

The Patent applicant will also be able to submit dictionaries, linguistic information, and other surrounding intelligence pertaining to the Patent design, as such that the Patent could protect from misuses of similar technologies, or systems that automatically take existing Patents, modify them in a small way, and then resubmit the works under different names, using different keywords, such that the Patent Attorney is not aware of how to compare the two different works, because they are so different, even though they are so similar.

An example of technologies that are very similar, in my cases, are the Telepathic Satellite Technology, Artificial Telepathy, and Geospatial Psychological Satellite technologies – and additionally, there are claims to the specific technologies and systems configurations that make the different technologies unique, but also similar.

It may not be worthwhile to submit for a Patent for all three of the designs, however the Intellectual Property pertaining to the designs could be used in legal cases, in such cases that information leaked out before the Patent was filed, or that someone conducted surveillance or hacked the inventor, and took the information from their computing systems. In this sense, criminal charges could be filed against the person(s) attempting to file the Patent(s) for similar technologies, even if the technologies have not been Patented, because the Intellectual Property belongs to the original inventor, and even if it was modified, it is still the property of the original inventor – regardless of whether they filed for the Patent or not.

The reason why I am waiting to file for the Patents, is because currently there is no demand for the technologies, and additionally I have no money to file for the Patents.

If I had to choose between getting married to Anya Chapman with enough money to live the rest of our lives without working, and owning the Patents – I would choose Anya Chapman. However, this doesn’t mean that people can just take the technologies from me, as they are my works. They would have to pay me to purchase the intellectual property, as I am proposing to the White House, so I have money for Anya and myself to live out our lives in comfort, so that we don’t have to suffer any more without each other – and the cost of the wedding would be taken out of the IP purchase agreement.

MCE123 Intellectual Property Rights Management

MCE123℠ invents original concepts in our Technology Development department, such as for new high-tech technologies, which can be purchased ahead of time by other organizations to develop into physical products for a fee. Some of these concepts have already been intellectually developed by MCE123℠ Technology Development, originally with all of the intrinsic qualities, developed naturally, over a long period of time, based on our own original thoughts about wanting to have these technologies, for our own professional usage, within our organization.

We require a physical contract to be in-person agreed to, stipulated through e-mail communications between us and our attorneys, reviewed by us, with our attorneys, and then agreed to with our attorneys present, with the organization that wishes to develop these technologies, before any work can begin on physically making these technologies, including any prototyping, per our internal policies, the entire time, including at our attorney offices.

We also require that anyone or any organization that works on intellectually developing any of our technologies, must have a contract agreed to with our company attorneys, ahead of time. Otherwise, people are not authorized by our company to work on developing, or engineering, or prototyping, or building, or manufacturing, or selling, or promoting, or marketing our technologies, even as other companies or other individuals.

Everyone must have our authorization, through a physical contract, agreed to with our attorneys present with us, in-person, to work on our products or services. These contracts must be stipulated ahead of time, in physical writing to our attorneys, regarding any invention you read about on our website. Please consult with the MCE123℠ Legal Department before using any concepts from us, as we spend countless hours developing these concepts from scratch, and you must pay us to use these concepts, or even modify the concepts and use the concepts, even through "revisions" or "modifications" or "improvements", even "improvements" that are "dangerous", even with significant "modifications" or "enhancements", even through "re-invention of the wheel". All works that derive from our works, including "extrapolations" or "derivatives", are our property if you do not follow due process by obtaining physically written permission from us ahead of time, in a contract that is notarized with us present, in addition to our company attorneys. Otherwise, you must purchase all intellectual property relating to any technology concept before you begin work on any of our products or our services. Failure to do so will result in Intellectual Property lawsuits and cases from our attorneys to compensate our company for intellectual and monetary damages that we have incurred due to any third party developing, using, or misusing any of our products or any of our services, even as other "facsimile" companies or "cloned" individuals. Misuse of our products or our services, including not having paid us to make them, including because of intellectual property theft, will result in the products and the services being taken away by law enforcement.

This Intellectual Property is owned by MCE123℠ Technology Development. By viewing this Intellectual Property, you agree to the rights of the IP holder established under the Intellectual Property Rights Management agreement. To use the Intellectual Property, you must first obtain an Intellectual Property license, and you must pay royalties for each product that is produced using the Intellectual Property license.

MCE123 Technology Usage Policy Disclaimer

MCE123℠ does not support experiments using animals or human beings, at all, and all trials pertaining to or using animals or human beings using technologies invented by MCE123℠ must be agreed to in a physically pre-written contract agreed to between MCE123℠, its attorneys, and each individual, a separately pre-written contract for each technology, a separately pre-written contract for each individual, with the terms of which can be modified in various ways to ensure the security of our staff and the public, and additionally of which each individual contract can be cancelled or audited at any time and at all times by any individual or legal staff in the public. Any usage of our technologies must also be paid for to MCE123℠, or there was no agreement and thus no contract to provide any products or services, not even for scientific experimentation and educational uses. Any unauthorized usage or utilization of our technologies will be filed under the misuse clause, to cease and desist all usage of our technologies by unauthorized persons or organizations.


DMCA.com Protection Status Site Protected by SiteLock